Society standards for Happiness and Depression
Often a sway in behavior between happy and sad is not acceptable in polite society. It seems often people could feel like there is something wrong with them if they have a dip or a high, which could lead a person to depend on drugs (legal or illegal) to think drugs are the only way to keep these emotions at bay.
Funny English Language
"I'm running behind" - Should mean that you will be early because you will arrive "behind" (or before) the scheduled time.
"Fiction" - As humans we think of "Real" (one word) and "Not Real" (two words). Therefore shouldn't the word "Fiction" be "Real" and "NON-FICTION" be "not-real"?
Extraordinary - I never understood this word, which literally means "Extra Ordinary". Wouldn't that mean you are boring and NOT unique?
"Conscience" - "Con" + "Science". Isn't this an ironic word?
"Times Up" - Should be"Your time has expired"?
Why is the snake considered evil?
The snake is often described as the Devil in the story of Adam and Eve. What if the snake represents human conscience? I often think "consciousness" could have the result the alteration to human DNA which has resulted in the regression of human behavior, rather than the advanced of.
The snake got a bad wrap. What if the story was written with a cute little puppy as the symbolic item that encouraged Eve to eat the apple? What would our world look like today?
Is time travel possible?
If travel can be done faster than the speed of light, then would our past of (lets say) 10,000 years be but a moment in time for an alien species when visiting earth?
From the perspective of the Alien from their planet, when standing on their plant viewing Earth, they would see what Earth looked like in the past. right? However, if that Alien could travel faster than the speed of light, then the Earth the Alien sees would be EARLIER than what the Alien is viewing when standing on their planet. Hmmmm.
Is time just an idea?
I wonder if the idea of time is simply a perspective based on cycles only.
For example, if an ant is on a leaf and it appears the sun rises and sets in what we humans perceive as 5 minutes, then a human 24 hours would convert into 288 cycles (or "days"). If this is true, the universe could hypothetically be 1 hour old if looking from above and over the universe.
Then, if the Universe is only 1 hour old, it should be a reasonable idea that everything is happening simultaneously. From our tiny human perspective, events are converted into a made-up line called "time."
An image I conjure up in my head is a pile of dust shot into water. Each speck moves in different directions at different speeds of travel and spin. What if the beginning of our universe was not a big "BANG" but rather simply a "tear and burst" of the fabric of space.
Dark matter is the water. with everything else as the "dust" of our existence. This would explain Einstein's theory of space-time, space travel and gravity.
Maybe the universe is much, much younger than 13.7 billion years (or cycles) old.
I guess the theory on everything would be something like ; "Everything moves constantly."
Hmmmmm.
What if the dark energy is a delicate form of movement that creates the dense black matter?
During the Double Slit Experiment and the testing of the Delayed Choice Experiment, it showed protons being sent through the slits in a wave pattern. When the observation was done after passing through the slits, the results showed protons "magically' going through the slits as particles. This resulted in a theory that the protons went back in time to change their form.
Wouldn't it make more sense to consider the movement of the particle form of protons affect the flow of dark energy? If so, is it hard to consider the act of observation would emit a pulse, allowing humans to see a screenshot of what is being observed rather than a moving image?
For example, if I took a picture of a boat (the proton) on top of the water (waves), I would only see the boat as an individual material item. It is ony when I understand that water moves that I can interpret the photograph as a wave.
Is consciousness a defect?
What if human Consciousness is a defect rather than an advancement? Humans' natural evolution of consciousness was developed to be able to outmaneuver its preditors with the only goal of staying alive. What if consciousness was not made to understand the Universe? If so, Scientists are simply the mechanics of the universe leaving humanity with no choice but to simply exist.
Traveling at the speed of light
What if we have fundamentally misinterpreted the nature of UAP (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) travel? Instead of envisioning these objects traversing vast distances, such as from California to China in an instant, consider the possibility that they approach a state of near-stasis in space, allowing Earth's motion through the cosmos to bring the destination—China into proximity with the UAP.
This leads to a provocative hypothesis: physics, as we currently understand it, primarily addresses the mechanics of space yet needs a comprehensive framework that focuses specifically on the movement itself.
Reflecting on Newton’s First Law of Motion, which states that "an object at rest remains at rest, and an object in motion continues in motion at a constant speed and in a straight line unless acted upon by an unbalanced force," we might question a foundational assumption: is anything ever truly at rest?
What if we were to develop a new educational paradigm—one that reimagines physics through the lens of motion as the core principle for all calculations? This approach could unveil novel insights into the interplay between objects, their movements, and the very fabric of our universe. I propose this field of study be called “Astromovology”.
I coined the term “Astromovology” to denote the study of the perpetual motion of celestial bodies. The prefix “Astro” refers to stars, combined with the English term “Move,” and the suffix “-ology,” derived from Greek, signifies a field of study or science. Thus, Astromovology encapsulates the exploration of stellar dynamics.
Does Spaghettification solve the question of how stones weighing several tons were moved?
Spaghettification is a theoretical term in physics and astronomy that describes the stretching of an object into a long, thin shape by extreme gravitational forces.
What if gravity and mass were lighter when massive stones (weighing several tons) were lighter and shorter?
Is it possible Spaghettification causes objects to lengthen and become heavier the closer Earth moves towards a black hole?