Often a sway in behavior between happy and sad is not acceptable in polite society. It seems often people could feel like there is something wrong with them if they have a dip or a high, which could lead a person to depend on drugs (legal or illegal) to think drugs are the only way to keep these emotions at bay.
"I'm running behind" - Should mean that you will be early because you will arrive "behind" (or before) the scheduled time.
"Fiction" - As humans we think of "Real" (one word) and "Not Real" (two words). Therefore shouldn't the word "Fiction" be "Real" and "NON-FICTION" be "not-real"?
Extraordinary - I never understood this word, which literally means "Extra Ordinary". Wouldn't that mean you are boring and NOT unique?
"Conscience" - "Con" + "Science". Isn't this an ironic word?
"Times Up" - Should be"Your time has expired"?
The snake is often described as the Devil in the story of Adam and Eve. What if the snake represents human conscience? I often think "consciousness" could have the result the alteration to human DNA which has resulted in the regression of human behavior, rather than the advanced of.
The snake got a bad wrap. What if the story was written with a cute little puppy as the symbolic item that encouraged Eve to eat the apple? What would our world look like today?
If travel can be done faster than the speed of light, then would our past of (lets say) 10,000 years be but a moment in time for an alien species when visiting earth?
From the perspective of the Alien from their planet, when standing on their plant viewing Earth, they would see what Earth looked like in the past. right? However, if that Alien could travel faster than the speed of light, then the Earth the Alien sees would be EARLIER than what the Alien is viewing when standing on their planet. Hmmmm.
I wonder if the idea of time is simply a perspective based on cycles only.
For example, if an ant is on a leaf and it appears the sun rises and sets in what we humans perceive as 5 minutes, then a human 24 hours would convert into 288 cycles (or "days"). If this is true, the universe could hypothetically be 1 hour old if looking from above and over the universe.
Then, if the Universe is only 1 hour old, it should be a reasonable idea that everything is happening simultaneously. From our tiny human perspective, events are converted into a made-up line called "time."
An image I conjure up in my head is a pile of dust shot into water. Each speck moves in different directions at different speeds of travel and spin. What if the beginning of our universe was not a big "BANG" but rather simply a "tear and burst" of the fabric of space.
Dark matter is the water. with everything else as the "dust" of our existence. This would explain Einstein's theory of space-time, space travel and gravity.
Maybe the universe is much, much younger than 13.7 billion years (or cycles) old.
I guess the theory on everything would be something like ; "Everything moves constantly."
Hmmmmm.
Perhaps a black hole of another universe punctured through our dark matter as a white hole and projected the supercondensed spec of matter into existence. From there, the matter expanded and experienced dark matter resistance, which could cause the swirling effect of galaxies.
The drag of the dark matter creates gravity (or pull) of matter. For example, the gravity of Earth could correspond to the rate at which the Earth is traveling through space in the drag behind the initial projected matter at the beginning of our universe. If this is true, each point of matter is affected by the other's pull of dark matter. Therefore, Gravity would be an all-encompassing effect vs. a flat/linear impact of /on the fabric of time.
Hmmmmm.
During the Double Slit Experiment and the testing of the Delayed Choice Experiment, it showed protons being sent through the slits in a wave pattern. When the observation was done after passing through the slits, the results showed protons "magically' going through the slits as particles. This resulted in a theory that the protons went back in time to change their form.
Wouldn't it make more sense to consider the movement of the particle form of protons affect the flow of dark energy? If so, is it hard to consider the act of observation would emit a pulse, allowing humans to see a screenshot of what is being observed rather than a moving image?
For example, if I took a picture of a boat (the proton) on top of the water (waves), I would only see the boat as an individual material item. It is ony when I understand that water moves that I can interpret the photograph as a wave.
What if human Consciousness is a defect rather than an advancement? Humans' natural evolution of consciousness was developed to be able to outmaneuver its preditors with the only goal of staying alive. What if consciousness was not made to understand the Universe? If so, Scientists are simply the mechanics of the universe leaving humanity with no choice but to simply exist.
Copyright © 2024 Yockits Thoughts - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.